Union Dues Deductions Not Required After Contract Expiration
Continuing its shift toward more employer-friendly workplace decisions, the National Labor Relations Board (Board or NLRB) in Valley Hospital Medical Center held that employers may cease deducting union dues from employees’ paychecks when the collective bargaining agreement with the union expires. This is a sharp reversal of a 2015 Obama-era decision that required employers to continue union dues deductions even after contract expiration and marks a return to the Board’s 1962 Bethlehem Steel decision.
In Valley Hospital Medical Center, the Board majority held that dues checkoff provisions are a mandatory subject of bargaining “rooted in the contract” and that employers have no independent statutory obligation under the National Labor Relations Act (the Act) to check off and remit employees’ union dues after contract expiration. The Board distinguished dues checkoff provisions, which do not exist at the outset of the bargaining relationship and are uniquely contractual in nature, from provisions related to wages, pension, hours, and other working conditions, which exist before the bargaining relationship even if they are subsequently bargained and appear in the contract.
Under well-settled law, once a union and employer have a bargaining relationship, an employer is prohibited from making changes to employees’ working conditions without first bargaining with the union. Even after a contract expires, employers generally are required to maintain the status quo until a successor contract is reached or the parties reach an impasse in bargaining. Despite the “status quo” rule, the Board and courts have recognized a narrow category of contract provisions that are not operative after contract expiration. These provisions are arbitration clauses, no strike/no lockout clauses, management rights clauses, and now, dues checkoff clauses.
The Board in Valley Hospital Medical Center said cessation of dues deductions at contract expiration is an “economic weapon” that employers may use to exert pressure in the collective bargaining process. The majority noted that employees still may be obligated, pursuant to union checkoff authorizations, to continue contributing to the union, but that unions should seek the payments directly from employees.
In her dissent, Democratic Board Member Lauren McFerran, whose term expired on December 16, called the majority’s decision “irrational” and “artificial.” She argued that the majority diminished the scope of collective bargaining, empowered employers, and undermined the role of unions in the American workplace.
Valley Hospital Medical Center may have sweeping effects on the collective bargaining process. Employers should think strategically before agreeing to interim extensions of collective bargaining agreements during negotiations for a successor contract. The Board’s decision is likely to encourage earlier negotiations for successor collective bargaining agreements because unions will be motivated to secure a successor agreement before contract expiration. Unions also may be motivated to negotiate longer-term agreements.Ballard Spahr's Labor and Employment Group monitors changes in law and policy at the NLRB and routinely assists clients in navigating collective bargaining negotiations and contract administration issues.
Copyright © 2019 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.
This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.