A recent federal district court decision has upheld an Arkansas Insurance Department rule that requires health benefit plans to submit certain pharmacy compensation information to the Department. The court ruled that this reporting requirement is not preempted by ERISA, finding that the rule does not apply exclusively to ERISA plans and that the reporting required by the rule was incidental to its purpose of assessing whether the compensation was fair and reasonable to ensure a sustainable network of pharmacy services.
The court’s ruling and its reasoning raise significant concerns for plan sponsors and could require group health plans to meet a patchwork of state reporting requirements. Indeed, Florida and several other states have already enacted their own PBM reporting requirements or are considering their implementation. For these reasons, we expect the ruling to be appealed and closely scrutinized under ERISA’s preemption provisions.
Subscribe to Ballard Spahr Mailing Lists
Get the latest significant legal alerts, news, webinars, and insights that affect your industry.
Subscribe Copyright © 2025 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
www.ballardspahr.com
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.
This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.