Scott D. Marty, Ph.D.

• Supports the technology transfer offices of several of the nation's top research universities and serve as preferred patent prosecution and corporate counsel for biotech, chemical, medical device, and pharmaceutical innovations as well as their spin-out companies
• Serves as patent prosecution and diligence counsel for a major biopharmaceutical company to help protect and develop an intellectual property strategy for the world's most comprehensive genetics database
• Serves as patent prosecution and counsel for an emerging growth company, and drafts and negotiates collaborative research, license and material transfer agreements in the pharmaceutical and cosmetics fields
• Serves as patent prosecution and counsel for an emerging growth company, and drafts and negotiates collaborative research, license and material transfer agreements in the agriculture and nutraceutical fields 

Patent Litigation

• On Symphony Health Solutions Corp. v. IMS Health Inc., (Patent Trial and Appeal Board), serving as member of the post-grant review litigation team for Symphony Health Solutions Corp. in challenging the validity of multiple covered business methods patents related to data record software, asserted against Symphony
• Member of the post-grant review litigation team for a web hosting company in software patent litigation matters involving issues concerning patentability and scope of protection for covered business methods
• Counsel for a DNA sequencing company in litigation in the District of Delaware relating to next-generation "sequencing by synthesis" DNA sequencing technology, and in various inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in which we are challenging the validity of various patents asserted against our client in the Delaware litigation
• Counsel for a DNA sequencing company in litigation in the Northern District of California relating to next-generation "sequencing by synthesis" DNA sequencing technology, and in various inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in which we challenged the validity of various patents asserted against our client in the California litigation
• On The University of Iowa and The University of Iowa Research Foundation v. Amgen et al. (S.D. Iowa 2008), counseled The University of Iowa and The University of Iowa Research Foundation in a patent infringement claim involving various pharmaceutical products
• On The University of Iowa and The University of Iowa Research Foundation v. Abbott Laboratories (S.D. Iowa 2009), counseled The University of Iowa and The University of Iowa Research Foundation in a patent infringement claim involving various pharmaceutical products
• On The University of Utah Research Foundation v. BIOSPACE et al. (D. Utah 2008), counseled The University of Utah Research Foundation in a patent infringement claim involving a device for measuring body composition