Corporate Political Disclosure Rankings Show 'Dramatic Gap' in Transparency Between Largest and Smaller Companies
- Center for Political Accountability and Penn’s Zicklin Center expanded their annual rankings of companies for political transparency this year to include the entire Russell 1000.
- Overall scores for transparency continue on an upward trend, but the gap between S&P 500 companies and the rest of the Russell 1000 is stark.
- Disclosure and accountability for corporate political spending are increasingly being adopted as ESG metrics and a focus for shareholders.
The Bottom Line
Every year for the past decade, the Center for Political Accountability and the University of Pennsylvania’s Zicklin Center for Governance and Business Ethics have published the CPA-Zicklin Index ranking U.S. companies for transparency and accountability in their political spending. This year, the CPA-Zicklin Index began rating the entire Russell 1000, not just the companies in the S&P 500. The researchers found a large gap between transparency and accountability for S&P 500 companies and the rest of the Russell 1000. The Index focuses on direct contributions to state and local candidates, parties, and committees; 527 groups; independent expenditures and ballot measures; as well as indirect contributions to trade associations and 501(c)(4) “social welfare” organizations.
Corporate political spending has ballooned since the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizen’s United. Shareholders have increasingly sought greater transparency from corporations in their political spending, calling for companies to align their political spending with stated corporate values. Companies are evaluating how their political spending comports with their ESG priorities and whether their spending is creating unintended risks. In the aftermath of January 6, many companies reevaluated their contribution policies and criteria, paused giving, and in a handful of cases, even folded their federal Political Action Committees.
In the absence of regulatory requirements to do so, these internal and external pressures have caused a growing number of companies to voluntarily disclose information about their political spending and lobbying activities. Many major U.S. companies care deeply about their ranking in the CPA-Zicklin Index and their overall scores continue to increase. The major findings from this year’s report reflect that upward pressure:
- The average Index score for political disclosure and accountability for all S&P 500 companies rose 3 percent over last year;
- 78 percent of S&P 500 companies fully or partially disclosed their political spending in 2022 or prohibited at least one type of spending;
- The number of core S&P 500 companies in the bottom tier for overall scores keeps shrinking, as it has consecutively since 2015;
- 89 companies are in the top “Trendsetter” tier;
- More than half of S&P 500 companies now have board-level oversight of political activities.
With the expansion of the CPA-Zicklin Index to the full Russell 1000 list, we expect to see similar pressures on these newly indexed companies to increase their transparency. Ballard Spahr has helped numerous clients develop political spending policies that balance the desire for transparency with the client’s policy goals and objectives. No matter where your company falls on the Index, we can assist you with navigating the challenges around political spending and disclosure, ensuring that your activities align with your ESG goals, and satisfying your shareholders.
Our Political and Election Law Group at Ballard Spahr counsels clients on their federal, state, and local political spending and develops compliance programs that help clients achieve their policy objectives. Please contact us for more information. More broadly, our ESG team applies the experience of lawyers from across the firm to address the unique ESG issues and goals of our clients. Please contact us for more information.
Subscribe to Ballard Spahr Mailing Lists
Copyright © 2024 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.
This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.