Legal Alert

Health Insurance Exchanges: A $12B Judgment

by the Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Group
May 1, 2020

The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that the federal government must pay over $12 billion to certain health insurers that participated in health insurance exchanges in the first three years that those exchanges were in effect. In Maine Community Health Options v. United States, the court ruled that health insurers that suffered financial losses beyond the corridors established under the Affordable Care Act’s Risk Corridors Program are entitled to recover for those losses.

The ACA created the temporary Risk Corridors Program as part of an effort to stabilize health insurance premiums, incentivize insurers to participate in the exchanges, and
mitigate financial risks borne by insurers for offering new products to new populations, including those with preexisting conditions. The Program applied from 2014-2016 and provided that health insurers that achieved a certain level of financial success under the program would pay some of their profits into the program, which would be used to make payments out to others that did not fare as well. In each of the three years in which it operated, the Program ran at a substantial deficit, and Congress refused to appropriate funds to make up the shortfall. As a result, insurers that stayed in the exchanges raised their premiums substantially. Other insurers left the exchanges, with some filing for bankruptcy. The lawsuits ensued. 


The Supreme Court found that:

  • In enacting the Risk Corridors Program, Congress created a statutory obligation on the government to pay insurers for the losses that were to be recoverable under the Program.
  • In failing to appropriate funds to pay insurers, Congress did not repeal its obligation to make those payments.
  • The insurers had the right to bring private lawsuits against the federal government in this instance, a finding challenged by Justice Samuel Alito in his lone dissent.

The case has now been remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s ruling. Although the ruling presents a victory for insurers, questions remain about when payments will be made, where within the federal government the funds will come from, how insurers will share in the recovery, and how any recovery by insurers may be applied.


Copyright © 2020 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
www.ballardspahr.com
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.

This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.


Subscribe to Ballard Spahr Mailing Lists

Get the latest significant legal alerts, news, webinars, and insights that affect your industry. 
Subscribe