1980s Sentencing Reform and Its Impact on Federal Plea Bargaining and the Trial Penalty

June 1, 2019

Reprinted with permission from Federal Sentencing Reporter, April/June 2019

In brief, the conventional wisdom that parties to a transaction "bargain" toward resolution is severely undermined when one party—by explicit design—may exact tremendous leverage over the other. As discussed below, although the 1980s reform efforts may have sought to achieve, among other things, parity among similarly situated defendants, they have in fact done just the opposite, at least insofar as concerns the gross divergence among sentences for defendants who plead guilty and those convicted after trial. Read More.

Copyright © 2019 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.

Subscribe to Ballard Spahr Mailing Lists

Get the latest significant legal alerts, news, webinars, and insights that affect your industry.