A recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in a bankruptcy case highlights a risk to consumer lenders and suggests a practical approach to risk management through clear policies and employee training. The court upheld a damages award based on a finding of the lender’s willful violation of the automatic stay invoked under Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, which takes effect when a borrower files for bankruptcy.

The automatic stay prohibits most activities related to the collection of a pre-bankruptcy debt and most actions against any property of the debtor serving as collateral for that debt. In consumer cases, Section 362(k) of the Bankruptcy Code allows a debtor injured by a lender’s willful violation of the stay to recover actual damages, punitive damages, and costs and attorneys’ fees.

In Rupanjali Snowden v. Check Into Cash of Washington, a decision issued on September 12, 2014, the Ninth Circuit addressed a stay violation by a payday lender that extended a $575 payday loan to the debtor secured by the debtor’s post-dated check. Before she filed for bankruptcy, the debtor put a stop payment on the check and advised the lender that she intended to file for bankruptcy protection. This began a series of calls from the lender to the debtor at her place of employment, despite debtor’s request that the lender not make such calls and instead contact the debtor’s attorney.

After the bankruptcy was filed, the lender used an electronic fund transfer (EFT) authorization to debit debtor’s bank account for $816.88 and continued to place calls to debtor’s workplace. The EFT resulted in the debtor’s bank account becoming overdrawn. The debtor alleged that these actions caused emotional distress and stress-related physical problems.

The Ninth Circuit upheld a damages award against the lender of $27,483.55. The award consisted of $12,000 for emotional distress damages, $12,000 in punitive damages, $2,538.55 in attorneys’ fees, $370 in overdraft fees, and the $575 loan amount. This award was based on a finding of the lender’s willful violation of the automatic stay, with punitive damages awarded under a “reckless or callous disregard for the law” standard.

The court based the punitive damages award on the lender’s failure “to provide a policy or employee training about how to deal with debt collection following a bankruptcy filing.” Ideally, the existence of a policy and/or employee training to address post-bankruptcy collection procedures could help lenders avoid violations of the automatic stay. In any event, the decision suggests that such policy and training might create an affirmative defense against punitive damage awards if the stay is violated by an employee who inadvertently fails to follow his or her training and established written policies. Conversely, the absence of a policy and employee training can be used as a basis to award punitive damages.

Consumer lenders should carefully review their internal policies and procedures, as well as employee training programs, to evaluate whether this simple and prudent protection against punitive damage awards is in place. A modest investment in risk management may provide protection from damage awards far in excess of the modest amount of the individual consumer loan involved with a stay violation. Of course, good policies and procedures are also helpful in satisfying the ever-increasing demands of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Federal Trade Commission, state and federal banking regulators, and state attorneys general.

Ballard Spahr’s Consumer Financial Services Group is nationally recognized for its guidance in structuring and documenting new consumer financial services products, its experience with the full range of federal and state consumer credit laws, and its skill in litigation defense and avoidance. Attorneys in the firm's Bankruptcy, Reorganization and Capital Recovery Group handle all aspects of insolvency, including restructuring, workouts, and refinancing of debt; creditor-debtor litigation; and reorganizations and liquidations both in and outside of bankruptcy.

For more information, please contact CFS Practice Leader Alan S. Kaplinsky at 215.864.8544 or kaplinsky@ballardspahr.com, CFS Practice Leader Jeremy T. Rosenblum at 215.864.8505 or rosenblum@ballardspahr.com, Bankruptcy, Reorganization and Capital Recovery Practice Leader Vincent J. Marriott III at 215.864.8236 or marriott@ballardspahr.com, Mark J. Furletti at 215.864.8138 or furlettim@ballardspahr.com, or Dean C. Waldt at 602.798.5480 or waldtd@ballardspahr.com.

Copyright © 2014 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.

This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.

Related Practices

Bankruptcy, Reorganization and Capital Recovery
Consumer Financial Services


Visit CFPB Monitor, our blog on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau >

Subscribe to the blog via e-mail >