The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) recently issued a Dear Colleague Letter and related questions and answers about the use of race in admissions following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin. Colleges and universities seeking to achieve racial and ethnically diverse student bodies should review these materials to ensure that their admissions procedures pass muster under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.

In Fisher, while the Court did not decide whether the university's policy of using race as a factor in admissions was constitutional, it said that university affirmative action policies must be reviewed with strict scrutiny. OCR and the DOJ take the position that Fisher “preserved the well-established legal principle” that achieving a diverse student body is a compelling interest that colleges and universities may pursue in their admissions programs.

The newly issued guidance clarifies that colleges and universities may lawfully consider the race of individual applicants as one of several factors as long as the admissions program can pass the heightened “strict scrutiny” standard. OCR and the DOJ caution that such college and university admissions programs must be narrowly tailored to meet a compelling interest in diversity. Colleges and universities also must demonstrate that available, race-neutral alternatives are insufficient to achieve the benefits of diversity such as cross-cultural understanding and classroom dialogue and a reduction in racial isolation.

The Dear Colleague Letter also makes clear that the December 2011 OCR/DOJ Guidance on the Voluntary Use of Race To Achieve Diversity in Postsecondary Education remains in effect. The 2011 guidance outlines a legal framework under Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger for the voluntary use of race in college and university admissions for institutions seeking to achieve a diverse student body.

The guidance clarifies that colleges and universities acting to achieve diversity must be able to show how that objective fits within their missions and must consider race-neutral approaches (e.g., looking at socioeconomic status or parental educational level) and the racial impact of such approaches. It also provides examples of when colleges and universities may consider the race of individual students in the admissions process, as well as guidance regarding the use of pipeline, recruitment, outreach, and mentoring programs.

If you have questions regarding university admissions policies or the impact of recent guidance from OCR and the DOJ, please contact Olabisi L. Okubadejo at 410.528.5532 or

Copyright © 2013 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.

This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.

Related Practice