The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday issued two Title VII decisions favorable to employers. One case examined the definition of a supervisor under the anti-discrimination laws, and the other dealt with an employee’s burden of proof in mixed-motive retaliation actions.

In Vance v. Ball State, the Court narrowed the definition of a supervisor for Title VII purposes. To be considered a supervisor, an employee must have the authority to hire, fire, demote, promote, transfer, or discipline the employee complaining of discrimination. If an employee does not have the authority to make these "tangible employment decisions," that employee will not be considered a supervisor. 

Under Title VII, employers are vicariously liable for the discriminatory actions of their supervisors. The Vance decision is important for employers because it limits the class of employees who can be considered supervisors, in turn narrowing an employer’s exposure to vicarious liability under Title VII.

On the same day, the Court also decided University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar. The Court held that in mixed-motive retaliation actions under Title VII (that is, one in which the employee alleges that the employer had both retaliatory and non-retaliatory reasons for the employment decision), an employee must prove that his or her protected activity was a “but-for” cause of the employer’s adverse employment action.

This decision changes the pre-existing burdens of proof in retaliation matters under Title VII. Instead of having to prove that retaliation was simply a motivating factor in mixed-motive cases, employees must now meet the higher burden of showing that they would not have suffered the adverse action “but-for” the retaliation.

Ballard Spahr's Labor and Employment Group routinely assists employers in Title VII and all other types of employment discrimination actions. If you have questions or concerns regarding Title VII or other types of employment discrimination, please contact Steven W. Suflas at 856.761.3466 or or the member of the Group with whom you work.

Copyright © 2013 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)


All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.

This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.

Related Practice

Labor and Employment