A recent Minnesota state court decision serves as a painful reminder to Internet lenders of the perils of relying on choice-of-law provisions or arguments citing the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution to avoid application of a borrower’s home state law.

In State of Minnesota v. Integrity Advance, LLC, the Minnesota Second Judicial District Court ruled that a payday lender, in making at least 1,269 Internet loans to Minnesota residents, had committed at least 7,614 separate violations of state law (six violations per loan). The court rejected the lender’s arguments that it was entitled to rely on the Delaware choice-of-law provision in its loan contracts and that application of Minnesota law would violate the Commerce Clause. 

Under Minnesota law, a payday loan contract may not contain a choice-of-law provision designating the law of any other state. According to the court, it did not violate the Commerce Clause to apply that prohibition, as well as Minnesota’s limits on payday loan interest charges and terms and other payday loan requirements, to the lender’s Internet loans because the loans did not occur “wholly outside” of Minnesota. The court considered the lender as having “entered” into Minnesota in its solicitation, origination, and servicing of the loans.

The case also highlights the severe penalties that Internet lenders can face for violations. Violations of Minnesota’s payday loan law are subject to statutory damages of up to $1,000 per violation and civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation. Noting that assessment of the maximum statutory damages and civil penalties formula would produce a total penalty of nearly $40 million, the court found the state’s imposition of a total penalty of $7 million to be “both measured as well as appropriate.” It also held the lender liable for the state’s costs, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees.

While illustrating the obstacles Internet lenders face, this case does not diminish the ability of lenders entering into in-person transactions to avoid states’ attempts to apply their laws to loans made to their residents but consummated in another state. In Midwest Title Loans, Inc. v. Mills, a unanimous decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, a Ballard Spahr client successfully argued that the Commerce Clause precluded Indiana from applying its laws to loans made in person in Illinois to Indiana residents. (In the aftermath of that decision, we successfully recovered $440,000 in attorneys’ fees for our client from the State of Indiana under Section 1988 of the federal Civil Rights Act.)

Ballard Spahr’s Consumer Financial Services Group is nationally recognized for its guidance in structuring and documenting new consumer financial services products, its experience with the full range of federal and state consumer credit laws, and its skill in litigation defense and avoidance.

For more information, please contact CFS Practice Leader Alan S. Kaplinsky at 215.864.8544 or kaplinsky@ballardspahr.com, CFS Practice Leader Jeremy T. Rosenblum at 215.864.8505 or rosenblum@ballardspahr.com, or Mark J. Furletti at 215.864.8138 or furlettim@ballardspahr.com.


Copyright © 2013 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.

This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.





Related Practice

Consumer Financial Services


Visit CFPB Monitor, our blog on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau >

Subscribe to the blog via e-mail >