Agreeing to review an important issue that has divided the federal circuit courts, the U.S. Supreme Court announced yesterday that it will decide the proper procedural vehicle for enforcing forum selection clauses.

A forum selection clause is a contract provision specifying that disputes will be resolved in a particular venue. Such clauses are widely used in commercial and consumer contracts, often in conjunction with arbitration provisions.

At issue is the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in In re: Atlantic Marine Construction Co., Inc. that the enforceability of forum selection clauses should be evaluated under the federal transfer statute, which permits district courts to transfer venue of a civil action based upon the “convenience of parties and witnesses” and “the interest of justice.”

A majority of the federal circuit courts, including the Second, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits, have held that a forum selection clause should be enforced by a motion to dismiss for improper venue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3), without considering the discretionary factors embodied in the federal transfer statute. These courts relied on prior Supreme Court decisions holding that forum selection clauses are prima facie valid and enforceable unless unreasonable under the circumstances and are binding even in a consumer contract not subject to negotiation.  

Ballard Spahr frequently advises businesses on the use and enforceability of forum selection clauses in contracts, particularly in conjunction with arbitration provisions.

The Supreme Court will hold argument in Atlantic Marine and decide the case next Term.  

Ballard Spahr’s Consumer Financial Services Group is nationally recognized for its guidance in structuring and documenting new consumer financial services products, its experience with the full range of federal and state consumer credit laws throughout the country, and its skill in litigation defense and avoidance (including pioneering work in pre-dispute arbitration programs).

The Group also produces CFPB Monitor, a blog that focuses exclusively on important CFPB developments. To subscribe, use the link provided to the right.

For more information, please contact Alan S. Kaplinsky at 215.864.8544 or kaplinsky@ballardspahr.com, or Mark J. Levin at 215.864.8235 or levinmj@ballardspahr.com. 


Copyright © 2013 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
www.ballardspahr.com
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.

This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.

Related Practices

Consumer Financial Services
Litigation

CFPB

Visit CFPB Monitor, our blog on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau >

Subscribe to the blog via e-mail >