The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is upholding tariffs it proposed earlier this year on imports of Chinese crystalline silicon photovoltaic (PV) cells and panels. The decision is the agency’s final determination in an investigation of dumping and inappropriate subsidies by Chinese PV cell and module manufacturers. Commerce found dumping margins ranging from 18.32% to 249.96% and countervailable subsidies ranging from 14.78% to 15.97%.  

Dumping occurs when a foreign company sells a product in the U.S. at less than its fair value. Countervailable subsidies are financial assistance from foreign governments that benefit the production of goods by foreign companies.

This will affect solar energy developers who import Chinese solar products because their market prices will likely reflect the tariffs. It will also affect U.S. manufacturers of solar cells because it may help them to better compete with imported solar products.

In its final determination, Commerce found dumping margins of 31.73% for PV cells made by Suntech, 18.32% for Trina Solar, 25.96% for Chinese firms that requested but had not received individual duty determinations, and 249.96% for all other Chinese PV producers. Commerce found countervailable subsidies of at 14.78% for Suntech, 15.97% for Trina Solar, and 15.24% for all other Chinese manufacturers.

Commerce affirmed that the scope of the investigation included crystalline silicon PV cells, and modules, laminates, and panels consisting thereof, either partially or fully assembled into other products. Commerce also affirmed that the investigation covered modules, laminates, and panels produced in a third country from cells produced in China. Modules, laminates, and panels produced in China from cells produced in a third country, however, are not covered.

Further, Commerce affirmed the finding of critical circumstances, which allows retroactive tariffs on imports going back to December 2011 for countervailing duties and February 2012 for anti-dumping duties. Commerce found no critical circumstances for Suntech, however, concerning dumping duties. Critical circumstances exist when a major spike in imports occurs ahead of the possible imposition of duties, necessitating retroactivity.  

The International Trade Commission (ITC) must also make its final determination in this case before Commerce's determinations become effective. ITC's determination is expected in November. Assuming an ITC affirmative vote, final duties will then be calculated.

This decision has broad implications for international trade, renewable energy, and U.S. manufacturing. Recently, the Obama administration has become increasingly critical of Chinese trade practices.

Commerce is also investigating wind turbine towers and other products from China and is expected to launch new investigations into Chinese hardwood and plywood products. The European Union is also investigating whether to impose duties on Chinese solar panel imports. China has struck back by launching an investigation into imports of solar-grade polysilicon from the U.S.

Commerce's determinations come at a time of increased trade tensions between the two countries and in an apparent escalation of trade confrontation in the shadow of a presidential election. This case continues to be worthy of the industry’s close attention.

For more information, please contact any member of the Energy and Project Finance Group. 

Copyright © 2012 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.

This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.

Related Practice