A recent decision by a California Court of Appeal reinforces the need for employers in the state to ensure that their employees are taking required meal and rest breaks and that such compliance is somehow documented. 

On February 16, 2011, the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, held in United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles that an employer may be liable for two hours of pay per workday if an employee establishes that he/she was denied both a required meal break and a required rest break. The Court rejected the UPS argument that it was liable for only one hour of pay per workday under such circumstances. 

Employers should take proactive measures to ensure that required meal and rest breaks are being taken. Evidence of compliance should be documented through a payroll system or otherwise. 

If you have any questions about the effect of the decision on your operations or general questions regarding requirements and compliance, please feel free to contact any member of the Labor and Employment Group.

Copyright © 2011 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.

This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.

Related Practice