Consumer financial service providers must work with counsel to urge the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to ensure that legitimate telephone calls, including from creditors and debt collectors, are not snared by the Truth in Caller ID Act of 2009 (TCIDA).

The FCC must adopt regulations implementing the TCIDA, enacted on December 22, 2010, no later than June 23, 2011. Although intended to target scammers who engage in caller ID spoofing, the TCIDA could adversely affect legitimate calls if the FCC fails to provide appropriate exemptions, as it has with the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

The TCIDA, P.L. 111-331, amends the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit any person within the United States, unless excepted by FCC regulations, “to cause any caller identification service to knowingly transmit misleading or inaccurate caller identification information with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value.” The prohibition applies to calls made using any telecommunications service or Internet protocol-enabled voice service.

Because the TCIDA neglects to define “misleading or inaccurate” caller ID information or the phrases “cause harm” or “wrongfully obtain anything of value,” it could conceivably be interpreted to reach collection calls by creditors and debt collectors that do not involve legally false information simply if the person called can allege some breach of privacy, emotional distress, or a mistake or technical deficiency of some kind as to any amount paid as the result of the call.

Significantly, the TCIDA could apply to collection calls when any of the following occurs:

  • A registered name under which the caller does business is displayed, rather than the caller’s legal name.
  • An abbreviated version of the caller’s legal name is displayed, rather than the caller’s complete legal name.
  • A caller’s legal name is displayed, but to comply with state and federal debt collection laws, the name does not indicate the purpose of the call and might even suggest a purpose other than debt collection.

Similarly, calls in which the phone number is displayed as a local number could potentially be deemed “misleading or inaccurate” if the call originates from a different area code or from a foreign country, even if the caller owns the local number, the call is routed through the local number, or the caller may be contacted using the local number. Likewise, indicating that a phone number is “unavailable” might be characterized as causing a caller identification service to transmit misleading information, even though the TCIDA expressly states that it does not prevent or restrict individuals from blocking information.

Although the TCIDA does not include a private right of action, it authorizes state Attorneys General and any other state officers authorized to bring actions on behalf of state residents to bring parens patriae civil actions in federal court to enforce the new prohibition or to impose draconian civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation, up to $30,000 per day for each day of a continuing violation, or up to $1 million for any single act or failure to act. Civil actions may be filed whenever a state Attorney General or other officer “has reason to believe that the interests of the residents of the State have been or are being threatened or adversely affected” by a violation of the TCIDA or the FCC’s implementing regulations. The TCIDA also provides that violators are subject to criminal fines and imprisonment.

Ballard Spahr’s Consumer Financial Services Group is nationally recognized for its knack for fairly and effectively presenting industry concerns in comment letters addressed to state and federal regulatory agencies, its guidance in structuring and documenting new consumer financial services products, its experience with the full range of federal and state consumer credit laws throughout the country, and its skill in litigation defense and avoidance (including pioneering work in pre-dispute arbitration programs). The litigators in the Group regularly defend all manner of Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act cases. For more information, please contact Group Chair Alan S. Kaplinsky, 215.864.8544 or; Vice Chair Jeremy T. Rosenblum, 215.864.8505 or; John L. Culhane, Jr., 215.864.8535 or; Barbara S. Mishkin, 215.864.8528 or; or Mark J. Furletti, 215.864.8138 or




Copyright © 2011 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)


All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.

This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.