In a development that may have a significant impact on product liability litigation in New Jersey and nationwide, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to review a recent New Jersey Supreme Court opinion that expanded the "stream-of-commerce" theory for personal jurisdiction. The U.S. Supreme Court's ultimate decision on the appeal may limit the ability of state courts to exercise personal jurisdiction over product companies.

 

On September 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Nicastro et al. v. McIntyre Machinery America Ltd. et al., which involves a personal injury lawsuit against the British manufacturer of an industrial metal cutter. (Click here to read our alert on the Supreme Court's holding in Nicastro.) The New Jersey Supreme Court, in a February 2, 2010, opinion, ruled that although the manufacturer had no presence in or even "minimum contacts" with New Jersey, personal jurisdiction over the defendant was warranted through an expansion of New Jersey's stream-of-commerce theory. A dissent to the Nicastro decision argued that the Court had failed to follow New Jersey's stream-of-commerce precedent, which established that the mere act of placing a product into the stream of commerce was, alone, insufficient to trigger personal jurisdiction.

The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Nicastro in tandem with its grant of certiorari in a North Carolina Supreme Court case, Goodyear Luxembourg Tires, et al., v. Brown, et al., which also involved the application of a stream-of-commerce theory to a foreign corporation in a product liability case.

Ballard Spahr's national product liability practice is focused in New Jersey, where several lawyers regularly defend foreign companies in class actions and jury trials and provide counseling to eliminate litigation risks before they arise. Please contact Neal Walters, 856.761.3438 or waltersn@ballardspahr.com.


Copyright © 2010 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
www.ballardspahr.com
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)

 

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.

This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.