The practice of states sanctioning employers in the arena of immigration law advanced toward U.S. Supreme Court review on February 2, 2010, when a decision divided federal appeals courts on the issue.

A three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Edmondson that federal immigration law preempted two key provisions of the Oklahoma sanctions law and unanimously upheld a lower court’s injunction against them. One challenged provision of the law survives.

The 10th Circuit decision clashes with an earlier 9th Circuit opinion that upheld Arizona's sanctions law in a case in which Ballard Spahr represented the business community. That decision has been appealed to the Supreme Court, which has asked the Justice Department to file a brief stating the federal government’s position on the issue. Meanwhile, the 10th Circuit decision bolsters the position that the Supreme Court should decide the issue of federal scope in the area of state employer sanctions.

The 10th Circuit affirmed an injunction blocking enforcement of a provision allowing a worker to sue an employer if the worker was terminated and the employer knowingly employed an undocumented worker. The court found that federal immigration law barring states from "imposing civil or criminal sanctions (other than through licensing and similar laws)" for the employment of unauthorized persons expressly overrode the provision.

Also upheld was an injunction blocking a requirement that businesses verify the work eligibility of independent contractors to withhold taxes from those contractors who do not demonstrate work authorization. The court found that federal law preempted that provision by implication because it does not require employers to verify work eligibility for contractors through the I-9 process, as is the case for employees.

The panel was divided over an injunction against a requirement that businesses entering into contracts with the state government use the E-Verify program, and that provision of the Oklahoma law survives. Therefore, employers conducting business with the Oklahoma state government should use E-Verify. Note that different E-Verify rules apply to federal contractors.

Copyright © 2010 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.

This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.

Related Practice