The U.S. Supreme Court recently made plain that whistleblowers' allegations will be scrutinized more closely. In a unanimous decision, it reversed an appellate court decision that threatened to broaden liability under the False Claims Act. The Supreme Court held, in Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders, that False Claims Act liability does not arise simply because government money is involved. Rather, there must be a direct link between the false statement and the federal government’s decision to pay or approve the false claim. Click here to view the court opinion.

For more information, please contact John C. Grugan at

Copyright © 2008 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.

This newsletter is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to alert the recipients to new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own lawyer concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.